Something that’s of little or no value isn’t worth fighting for – hence, last week’s fascinating dust-up in resource-rich northwest British Columbia speaks volumes as a Tahltan activist group led by TCC President Chad Norman Day blockaded Doubleview Capital’s (DBV, TSX-V) Hat Project discovery in the prolific Sheslay district. As DBV reported, the company is reviewing all of its options as it works toward a resumption of drilling at the Hat as quickly as possible.
In a political way, this illegal blockade confirmed what a multitude of geologists and a couple of highly respected geoscientists (from different companies) have been speculating about for more than 2 years now – that this large area of the Stikine Arch has a strong probability of hosting a series of world class Cu-Au porphyry deposits like “pearls on a string” across a minimum 30-km long NW/SE trending mineralized corridor after a total of 50 completed drill holes in the district since the spring of 2013, combined with a plethora of valuable historical data going back more than half a century. One or more high-grade Gold deposits is also possible, several geologists believe, around the edges of one of these porphyry systems or somewhere at considerable depth. Northwest B.C. is a geological wonder. And the fluid “throughput” in this particular district has been remarkable according to the experts.
Keep in mind, there were also Tahltan blockades and protests as the world class Red Chris deposit, on the same trend about 120 km to the southeast, matured to its current mine stage (it has just become the 6th mine to open in B.C. since 2011). Day cleverly steered the Red Chris situation for the Tahltan, and managed to negotiate an “historic” agreement between the Tahltan Nation and mine owner Imperial Metals (III, TSX) earlier this year, not long after the fallout over the Mount Polley spill.
A “Monster” Of A Hat
In the Sheslay district, it’s important to note that nothing has been proven up yet on any property in terms of NI-43-101 resources (no estimates completed so far), but some back-of-the-envelope calculations do light up the imaginations of many. Defining a high-grade starter area will be key.
The Hat is leading the way at the moment with a Gold-rich Copper porphyry system now interpreted to extend well beyond the company’s original significant discovery reported in January 2014. DBV President and CEO Farshad Shirvani mortgaged his house to drill those key holes during a major early winter cold snap in November 2013 (he should have won Prospector-of-the-Year, but that opportunity may yet come).
Also of growing interest is the yet-to-be-drilled Grizzly Project. It covers a whopping 284 sq. km (Garibaldi Resources, GGI, TSX-V) and has prime targets scattered throughout with astonishingly similar structures and geophysical and geochemical signatures as the adjoining Hat and Star properties.
It may seem convenient for him to say this, but GGI President and CEO Steve Regoci, who has found success for Garibaldi in Mexico, is a genuine huge believer in the Sheslay district and recently referred to the Hat as a “monster” following the release of an updated interpretation of the system by Doubleview on July 2.
Stopped In Mineralization…Due To A Blockade!
How often has this ever occurred? In what must have been a dramatic moment, the Tahltan group pictured below stopped drilling of H-25 at the Hat late last Tuesday while the hole was in a zone of Gold-Copper porphyry mineralization at a depth of 270 meters as reported by DBV – very significant, perhaps, because H-25 was a whopping 1-km step-out to the northwest of the Lisle Discovery Zone. That’s what turned DBV into a 10-bagger and sparked a district staking rush early last year (subsequent rounds of drilling have produced even better results than discovery holes H-8 and H-11).
The Issue
So what is the Hat/Sheslay district protest all about? The district is primarily in Tahltan territory, and there is no question the Tahltan have important interests at stake. It’s incumbent upon the companies working in the area to deal with all First Nations cooperatively and respectfully. That goes without saying, and at BMR we have no patience anymore for junior resource companies who “drop the ball” and snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, whatever the issues might be. In this case, however, we stand firmly on the side of Doubleview, Garibaldi and others in the district who are having to deal with chaotic actions as part of a certain agenda.
Industry and government officials and of course investors have every reason to be shaking their heads at statements made by Day since he started the Sheslay Circus with a May 21 letter that was posted on the Tahltan website and delivered to 3 companies including of course Doubleview:
“Our Elders have provided consistent direction about the critical need to protect the Sheslay now and for future generations,” Day wrote in his letter. “Our people have been clear that mining in the Sheslay will not be tolerated, and the Tahltan Nation does not support mineral exploration activities occurring in this area.”
Oh, really? The Tahltan’s actions and inactions, however (including Day’s), tell a much different story. And why is it that Teck Corporation (TCK.B, TSX), which has been carrying out exploration at the large Eagle Project contiguous to the southern boundary of the Grizzly, didn’t receive a letter?
History
1. Exploration in the district dates back at least 6 decades, a period during which the Tahltan actively participated in exploration activities in the area and even helped build and maintain important infrastructure to enable development – i.e., the Golden Bear mine access road and the bridge over the Sheslay River to connect to the past producing high-grade Golden Bear Gold mine east of the Grizzly (of course there’s also the Sheslay airstrip where you can probably land a WestJet plane in an emergency – we’ll get to that on another day).
Permits Granted
2. There was no Tahltan opposition to the multi-year exploration and drill permits issued to Doubleview, Garibaldi or others by the B.C. Ministry of Energy & Mines, so these companies have the full legal authority to drill. First Nations consultation is a requirement to receive a “NOW” permit, and the Tahltan had multiple opportunities to voice their concerns. Day’s answer to this is that they were not “properly” consulted.
It’s noteworthy that in late April of this year, Doubleview announced that it had received an “expanded 5-year exploration and drilling permit” from the Ministry. The Tahltan were consulted on the amended or “expanded” permit, and it passed through their land management division.
Garibaldi received its 5-year exploration and drilling permit during the 2nd half of last year (after Day’s election as TCC President), and Prosper Gold’s (PGX, TSX-V) expanded permit was awarded in early 2014.
All this under the watchful eyes of the Tahltan. Are we to believe that a bunch of people were just simply asleep at the switch? They weren’t. Some were actually very focused on trying to make money off this hot exploration play as about $10 million has been invested in the district since 2013.
Tahltan Does The Drilling
3. The real difficult question for Day to answer, given his strange claim that the Tahltan Nation does not support mineral exploration in the area, is why Tahltan Drilling Services has been allowed to drill every single hole so far at the Hat Property? And why have other Tahltan-related exploration services companies been carrying out work in the district?
Up until the end of last month, as announced at the Tahltan AGM during the first weekend of July, Tahltan Drilling Services (formed around 2009) was under the majority (51%) control of the TNDC, the business arm of the Tahltan Nation.
The fact that the Tahltan drilled the first couple of dozen holes at the Hat, even holes after Day was elected TCC President including H-23, is as big of an endorsement of exploration in the district as one could give – it’s not good enough to simply state that there’s a “separation” between the business arm of the Tahltan and “leadership”.
As it states on the TNDC website, TNDC is a 3-decade old business corporation owned by the people of the Tahltan Nation through the Tahltan Band, the Iskut Band and the Tahltan Central Council.
Hole 23, Revised Hat Model, & Day Goes Into Action Mode
Day’s “light bulb” moment in late May was no coincidence, in our view. Importantly, his uprising over the Sheslay district did not start until after results from DBV‘s hole 23 (a game-changer) and public release of powerful new geological conclusions regarding the size potential of the dynamic Hat system from an exceptional DBV technical team led by Dr. Abdul Razique, who Shirvani smartly recently recruited from Copper giant Antofagasta (known to be looking for a big project in B.C.).
As far as the blockade is concerned, it came just 5 days after DBV’s critical July 2 news release and the announcement of a major step-out – 1 km – from the Lisle Discovery Zone. And just as Garibaldi is gearing up to drill the Grizzly for the first time ever for a potential 3rd important discovery in the area.
Leverage, Leverage, Leverage
Day leveraged a special opportunity, given market conditions and Imperial Metals‘ troubles over Mount Polley, to cut what apparently is a favorable agreement for the Tahltan with respect to the operation of the Red Chris mine. Both sides should be winners, really, but Day came out of that looking strong and that was good for him and his people. Score one for The Kid.
“Government and industry understand that the First Nations people need to benefit when these things are built,” Day was quoted in a recent Vancouver Sun article. “But with the Tahltan, it actually makes a lot of sense to partner with us because we have the capacity, we have the work ethic, we have the experience.”
Dr. Razique has a fascinating model for the Hat, and it seems Day has his own very interesting model for creating “unique” partnerships between the Tahltan and resource companies.
Our conclusion is that what’s really happening here is a high-stakes game of Chad Day “leverage” against both the provincial government and Doubleview, and of course against Garibaldi and other participants in the Sheslay district.
It’s no secret Day is hoping to strike a deal as quickly as possible on a broad-based land management agreement between the Tahltan and the province, and using a high-impact exploration play with major potential like the Hat Project and the Sheslay district in general could be viewed as an astute strategy, as long as he doesn’t slip on a few banana peels of course.
As he stated in his May 21 letter, “The Tahltan Central Council is currently engaged in government-to-government negotiations with the Province of British Columbia to reach a long-term approach to land planning, management and decision-making throughout Tahltan territory where the Tahltan Nation plays a central role.”
So, Minister Bennett and Premier Clark, how does it feel to get the “Sheslay Squeeze” from a rising 28-year-old star, fresh out of the University of Victoria?
Within the Tahltan, there do appear to be internal divisions over land management “strategy”, and it’ll be interesting to see how Day deals with this. As we reported last week (information that was confirmed on the Tahltan website), the Tahltan’s very amicable long-time manager of land management issues, Nalaine Morin (Project Manager for THREAT, a division of the TCC), abruptly resigned last month.
Money, politics and power – that’s what’s really driving all of this. That’s the world we live in. And you can’t take a major discovery in B.C., as mining-friendly as it is, and turn it into a mine without going through a lot of “noise”.
Consequently, investors should be more convinced than ever of the immense potential mineral wealth that Doubleview is uncovering at the Hat, that GGI believes exists at the Grizzly, and could be found elsewhere along the Sheslay mineralized corridor which is clearly one of the country’s most promising mineral districts.
Note: John and Jon both hold share positions in DBV and GGI.
Excellent John and Jon. I look forward to the counting articles. As for Garibaldi (GGI), I hope Steve Regoci starts starts coming out with some news on the Mexico discoveries until this Sheslay area and Tahltlan issue comes to a conclusion.
Comment by Andrew — July 13, 2015 @ 5:24 am
Amazing writeup Jon!
Comment by STEVEN1 — July 13, 2015 @ 5:25 am
Not sure what to believe anymore.
Comment by Ted — July 13, 2015 @ 6:30 am
Why nothing from GGI and PGX about the situation in Sheslay ????
Comment by guy delisle — July 13, 2015 @ 6:42 am
Why nothing from GGI regarding Mexico is what I want to know.
Comment by Dan — July 13, 2015 @ 6:48 am
Jon, I have a silly question: Is it possible for the Tahltan to reclaim DBV’s land?
Comment by chris — July 13, 2015 @ 6:49 am
Guy- GGI and PGX are probably waiting to see how DBV handles the situation and what the outcome is.
Comment by d4 — July 13, 2015 @ 6:51 am
Thanks BMR for the constant updates. Essentially we have no choice but to wait it out and watch what happens. I am sure much more will unfold over the coming weeks but there should be no doubts at this point regarding the property potential.
Comment by Jamie — July 13, 2015 @ 6:52 am
Chris, no. If you want to let your fears run wild and imagine an incredible scenario where DBV can’t explore at the Hat anymore, do u know what the potential cash settlement would be for DBV? Huge. Fortune Minerals is a starting point. The lawsuits would be massive. Perhaps far exceeding DBV’s current market cap?
Comment by Jon - BMR — July 13, 2015 @ 6:56 am
BMR, your article is most informative and spot on. Keep up the good work by keeping the information flowing that removes doubt from people’s minds.
Comment by Les — July 13, 2015 @ 6:58 am
Jon, I don’t have any shares in DBV, so no fear on my part. I am just thinking as to what Chad’s strategy could be. It was one scenario that popped up in my mind yesterday.
Comment by chris — July 13, 2015 @ 6:59 am
Looking forward to see that interview with Tahltan Drillers , I’m sure their really happy about the Chad Day blockade. I doubt this is easy sailing for Chad Day as he will be taking a lot of heat from all the people and businesses among his people.
Comment by Les — July 13, 2015 @ 7:12 am
Jon- when can we expect more physical proof such as the lead driller interview, etc?
Comment by d4 — July 13, 2015 @ 7:14 am
Les, how about these for opening words from one Tahltan driller, “I am angry.” Reminds me of that movie I saw Saturday night, “Inside Out”. Would highly recommend it. Folks, if you can believe this, the best is still yet to come IMHO…get behind Farshad, more than ever…you’ll be glad you did.
Comment by Jon - BMR — July 13, 2015 @ 7:18 am
Very soon, d4. One thing at a time. Speaking of time, we haven’t found a way yet to extend the day to 36 hours!
Comment by Jon - BMR — July 13, 2015 @ 7:22 am
Jon- if the Tahltan driller is hungry maybe there isn’t much to eat at the site… lol. This isn’t much confirmation.
Comment by d4 — July 13, 2015 @ 7:24 am
Fellas, let’s not forget that these gentlemen at BMR are doing this research, and posting it for all to see – free of charge. There seems to be a sense of expectation now from a few readers, probably because BMR has been so good at dispensing info – you know how it goes – keep getting gifts regularly, and you come to expect it, and get upset when it doesn’t come when you think it should…
Not trying to be disrespectful – I enjoy reading everyone’s opinions on this.
I’m not a huge shareholder, I just hope it’s enough to gain entry into the SVMC!! Any guesses as to how many shares that might take take???
Cheers all!
Comment by Paul — July 13, 2015 @ 8:22 am
Here is a bit of historical information on the Tahltan drilling company. This information came from the CA Executive Business magazine.
Supporting a Community:
Many ventures have involved mining, and all are structured to benefit territory residents. For example, TNDC has established companies such as Tahltan Drilling Services Corporation, which was formed in 2010 to facilitate the provision of drilling services in the traditional territory, and to provide training and safety programs to locally recruited general labour, drill operators, drill helpers and other personnel.
“TNDC as an organization earns all its own revenues from contract work without government funding. It is a limited partnership owned by its shareholders, the Tahltan band, the Iskut band and the Tahltan Central Council, with TNDC acting as a general partner,” explains Adsit.
http://edition.pagesuite-professional.co.uk/launch.aspx?referral=mypagesuite&pnum=&refresh=5An014HpF1r2&EID=627effc6-84c9-4b26-a96d-4d8cc7544a5f&skip=
Comment by Andrew — July 13, 2015 @ 8:32 am
It is imperative that the mines minister moves fast on this issue. If the Tahltans are acting outside the law this needs to be acted upon immediately given what is at stake. There is a window of availability for companies to explore and drill this region and if it is permitted by government then this should have been hammered out before permits were issued. Everybody that is invested should have their stake rise or fall but nobody should be held hostage. Time is money and if the government gave proper notice to the Tahltan for their concerns in regards to permitting this area, if they dropped the ball, too bad! This is the way business is done. The government shouldn’t be buying back leases to keep the calm. That is dereliction of duty. The mining branch of government can’t be that busy that they can’t deal with mining which used to be the #2 industry in BC.
Comment by geodcan — July 13, 2015 @ 9:18 am
Morning Musings to be posted at approx. 11:30 am Pacific, a little later than usual due to heavy workload…
Comment by Jon - BMR — July 13, 2015 @ 9:49 am
This could take weeks to get through.
From Imperial Metals website:Imperial Metals Corp. (TSX: T.III, Stock Forum) has filed a lawsuit against individuals that are blocking access to its Red Chris copper-gold mine in Northern British Columbia, according to a Stockwatch report.
In a lawsuit filed in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, the company said that two groups are preventing it from moving people or equipment to the site.
The roadblocks are active despite previous agreements the company said it had with the Tahltan Central Council and Iskut First Nation, according to the Stockwatch report.
According to a statement of claim filed on October 3, 2014, the defendants include Rhoda Quock, a Tahltan member who heads a group called the Klabona Keepers. Also named in the suit is Kanahus Manuel, a member of the Secwepemc First Nation, Stockwatch said.
So,even though there may have been agreements made,if some part of the band wants to blockade,they can just shut down an operation.In the picture up above,what are we looking at…5 people?There is the TCC and two bands as part of the Tahltan Nation,so there has to be clearance from the 3 groups,not 1 or 2 before you start working on the property.Imo,it looks like all 3 groups were not consulted.Or at least one disagreed and are now voicing their opinion in this manner.
Jmo,but the problems they had with Fortune Minerals was an major environmental concern,as was the Red Chris,which had a major breach in its tailings pond.
The Tahltan have okayed the Northern Transmission Line with BC Hydro and okayed 3 run of river projects with AltaGas,so they aren’t just shutting down operations for the fun,they want the jobs and advantages that come with these mines in the area.Obviously,someone has some concerns and wants it all down in writing before the project proceeds.Chad Day is a lawyer,so he’s not a stupid man.Farshad has proven to be a trustworthy person.It may take some time,but it should get settled amicably.Jmo.
Comment by jim niles — July 13, 2015 @ 10:01 am
Only one way for DBV NEGOTIATION
Comment by Guy Delisle — July 13, 2015 @ 4:57 pm